What evidence should the Auditors have seen that should have indicated there was a fraud being committed?

I need to answer these questions:
1. What were the frauds ZZZZ Best was committing?
2. How did they get away with committing these frauds for so long?
3. What evidence should the Auditors have seen that should have indicated there was a fraud being committed?
4. What type of engagement are the auditors going to perform in 1986 as referrenced in the engagement letter between Ernst & Whinneys and ZZZZ Best dated 9/12/1986?
5. What Type of engagement are the auditors referrencing they will perform in 1987 in the engagement letter between Ernst & Whinneys and ZZZZ Best dated 9/12/1986?
6. What was Barry doing in 2009 that got him put back in Prison? Explain how the fraud was being committed.
7. What internal control could the church have had in place to prevent or identify what Minkow was up to in the Lennar’s case?
Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: