Tom Davenport, in “Analytics 3.0,” discusses the distinguishing features of what he calls 3 stages: Analytics 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. Do you agree or disagree with his characterization, and why or why not?

  1. Discussion Forum Activity – Group 2 Finance

From

No unread replies.11 reply.

Tom Davenport, in “Analytics 3.0,” discusses the distinguishing features of what he calls 3 stages: Analytics 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. Do you agree or disagree with his characterization, and why or why not? What evidence do you bring to bear on this?

In this discussion, I will be looking for evidence that you understand the stages of development of analytics and what does and does not distinguish this particular era. Your individual participation will be assessed according to the level of your engagement in the discussion space and your ability to translate and synthesize content from the readings and your peers.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: