State legislatures and school boards have begun banning snacks and soda from school campuses and vending machines.

Your assignment is to argue/debate any essay in your textbook. You are debating the claims of the essay, offering a counter-argument. Make sure it’s something you really disagree with, so you can write a nice juicy essay. All topics must be approved by me by ___.
-first, you must argue using facts and research. Just because you are using the essay, doesn’t mean you get out of supporting your opinions. Stating that the writer is an idiot and therefore wrong, is not arguing.
-second, you must use evidence to support your assertions (SPECIFIC QUOTES from outside sources)
-make sure you are debating the claims of the essay, not just offering your opinion on the topic.
-types of evidence: statistics, examples, authorities, and textual evidence. (Keep in mind: Ideas not beliefs).
-make sure you have a clearly defined thesis
Essay Requirements
-5-7 pages in length.
-12 pt. font, either Times New Roman or Arial, with 1 inch margins
-double spaced
– Up to 4 sources ONLY , 1 online from a database, 1 book, the other 2 can be from sources of your choosing.
– a works cited page and in-text quotations and citations in MLA format.

The essay you are counter arguing is the right here:

Nutrition activists are agitating for a panoply of initiatives that would bring the government between you and your waistline. President Bush earmarked $125 million in his budget for the encouragement of healthy lifestyles. State legislatures and school boards have begun banning snacks and soda from school campuses and vending machines. Several state legislators and Oakland, California, Mayor Jerry Brown, among others, have called for a “fat tax” on high-calories foods. Congress is considering menu-labeling legislation that would force chain restaurants to list, fat, sodium, and calories for each item.
That is precisely the wrong way to fight obesity, Instead of intervening in the array of food options available to American, out government ought to be working to foster a personal sense of responsibility for our health and well-being.
We’re doing just the opposite. For decades, America’s health-care system has been migrating toward nationalized medicine. We have a law that requires some Americans to pay for other American’s medicine, and several states bar health insurers from charging lower premiums to people who stay fit. That removes the financial incentive for making healthy decisions. Worse, socialized health care makes us troublingly tolerant of government trespasses on our personal freedom. If my neighbors’ heart attack shows up on my tax bill, I’m more likely to support state regulation of what he eats-restrictions on what grocery stores can put on their shelves, for example, or what McDonald’s can put between its sesame-seed buns.
The best way to combat the public-health threat of obesity is to remove obesity from the realm of “public health.” It’s difficult to think of a matter more private and less public than what we choose to put in our bodies. Give Americans moral, financial and personal responsibility for their own health, and obesity is no longer a public matter but a private one-with all the costs, concerns and worries of being overweight borne only by those people who are actually overweight.
Let each of us take full responsibility for our diet and lifestyle. We’re likely to make better decisions when someone else isn’t paying for the consequences

it can’t have anymore then 4 sources.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page: