In a paper of 1,000 – 1,250 words, support or debate the concept of innate good through the following lenses of personality development: 1. Trait theories

Due Date: Nov 02, 2016 23:59:59       Max Points: 240

 

Details:

 

Psychologists and theologians alike have disputed the concept of innate good. It remains a central question in the study of personality. In this assignment, you will discuss the concept of innate good in relation to several personality theories.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.

Directions:

In a paper of 1,000 – 1,250 words, support or debate the concept of innate good through the following lenses of personality development:

  1. Trait theories
  2. Biological theories
  3. Humanistic theories
  4. Behavioral theories

 

 

 

 

Rubric:

 

A statement of support or debate of innate good through the lens of trait theories is present, thoroughly described with rich detail, and includes a discussion of all necessary elements.

 

 

A statement of support or debate of innate good through the lens of biological theories is present, thoroughly described with rich detail, and includes a discussion of all necessary

 

 

A statement of support or debate of innate good through the lens of humanistic theories is present, thoroughly described with rich detail, and includes a discussion of all necessary elements.

 

A statement of support or debate of innate good through the lens of behavioral theories is present, thoroughly described with rich detail, and includes a discussion of all necessary elements.

 

All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources.

 

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

 

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

 

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

 

 

All format elements are correct.

 

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

 

 

No Plagiarism at all

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: