Explain how you plan to collaborate with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in your future professional practice.

Taking on the role of a general education teacher, create an inclusive classroom lesson plan for a topic and grade level of your choice, aligned to a Common Core State Standard or other content standards from your state.

Complete the highlighted areas on the “COE Lesson Plan Template.” Be sure to include specific tasks/activities that a classroom paraeducator will be responsible for in the lesson.

Compose a 500 word reflection on your lesson plan. Include the following:

  1. Justify how your lesson plan incorporates collaborating with a paraeducator.
  2. Describe how you will provide feedback to the paraeducator after the lesson.
  3. Explain how you plan to collaborate with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in your future professional practice.

Submit your lesson plan and lesson plan reflection as one deliverable.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

 

 

 

 

 

COE LESSON PLAN TEMPLATE

 

Teacher Candidate:

Grade Level:

Date:

Unit/Subject:

Instructional Plan Title

 
I.  Planning
Lesson Summary and Focus:  
Classroom and Student Factors:  
National/State Learning Standards  
Specific Learning Target(s)/Objectives

 

Teaching Notes

 

Agenda

 

Formative Assessment

 

Academic Language Key vocabulary

 

Function

 

Form

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instructional Materials, Equipment, and Technology  
Grouping  

 

 

II. Instruction
A.  Opening
Prior Knowledge Connection  
Anticipatory Set  
B.  Learning and Teaching Activities (Teaching and Guided Practice)
I Do Students Do Differentiation
     

 

III. ASSESSMENT
Summative Assessment   Differentiation:

 

Closure

 

 
Homework  

 

Reflection:

 

 

RUBRIC

 

Collaborative Lesson Plan 

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria  
20.0 %Lesson Plan: Lesson Summary and Focus Not addressed. Lesson plan summary and focus inadequately summarizes the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content/skills to be taught. Lesson plan summary and focus adequately summarizes the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content/skills to be taught. Lesson plan summary and focus soundly summarizes the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content/skills to be taught. Lesson plan summary and focus thoroughly summarizes the lesson, identifying the central focus based on the content/skills to be taught.
20.0 %Lesson Plan: National/State Learning Standards and Learning Targets/Objectives Not addressed. Lesson plan national/state standards are irrelevant to the lesson content. Lesson plan learning targets/objectives are not specific to what the students will be able to do after the standards-based lesson. Lesson plan national/state standards are appropriate to the lesson content. Lesson plan learning targets/objectives are clearly specific to what the students will be able to do after the standards-based lesson. Lesson plan national/state standards are relevant to the lesson content. Lesson plan learning targets/objectives are undoubtedly specific to what the students will be able to do after the standards-based lesson. Lesson plan national/state standards are relevant to the lesson content. Lesson plan learning targets/objectives are specific to what the students will be able to do after the standards-based lesson and expertly written.
25.0 %Lesson Plan: Agenda and Learning and Teaching Activities Not addressed. Lesson plan agenda weakly identifies and provides approximate time for the opening of the lesson, learning and teaching activities, and closure to be posted for students. Lesson plan details inappropriate I Do, Students Do, and Differentiation aspects of the lesson. Lesson plan agenda identifies and provides approximate time for the opening of the lesson, learning and teaching activities, and closure to be posted for students. Lesson plan details appropriate I Do, Students Do, and Differentiation aspects of the lesson. Lesson plan agenda soundly identifies and provides approximate time for the opening of the lesson, learning and teaching activities, and closure to be posted for students. Lesson plan details advanced I Do, Students Do, and Differentiation aspects of the lesson. Lesson plan agenda identifies and provides quality approximate time for the opening of the lesson, learning and teaching activities, and closure to be posted for students. Lesson plan details proficient, professional I Do, Students Do, and Differentiation aspects of the lesson.
30.0 %Lesson Plan Reflection Not addressed. Lesson plan reflection poorly justifies how the lesson plan incorporates collaborating with a paraeducator and describes how feedback to the paraeducator will be provided after the lesson. Reflection inadequately explains collaboration with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in future professional practice. Lesson plan reflection clearly justifies how the lesson plan incorporates collaborating with a paraeducator and describes how feedback will be provided to the paraeducator after the lesson. Reflection adequately explains collaboration with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in future professional practice. Lesson plan reflection soundly justifies how the lesson plan incorporates collaborating with a paraeducator and describes how feedback will be provided to the paraeducator after the lesson. Reflection provides an advanced explanation as to collaboration with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in future professional practice. Lesson plan reflection insightfully justifies how the lesson plan incorporates collaborating with a paraeducator and describes how you will provide feedback to the paraeducator after the lesson. Reflection provides a quality explanation as to collaboration with other special education teachers regarding lesson plan design and utilizing the help of paraeducators in future professional practice.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
100 %Total Weightage  

 

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: