Drawing on the topics and theories that you have studied in this course, write a discussion posting that describes what Ericsson did that was effective and what it did that was ineffective in its approach to cross-cultural management.

Review the case study of Ericsson’s negotiations with the Chinese telecommunications organizations.

Please use this article as Primary Journal which I have attatched:

Ghauri, P. & Fang, T. (1999) The Chinese business negotiation process: a socio-cultural analysis

• Drawing on the topics and theories that you have studied in this course, write a discussion posting that describes what Ericsson did that was effective and what it did that was ineffective in its approach to cross-cultural management.
• In explaining your answer, make specific reference to at least two of the following cultural dimensions: communication, ethics, relationships, marketing, human resource management, and cultural characteristics (using any of the models that you have studied) specific to the Swedish or Chinese culture.

Please just for once use a competent writer, read the relevant article and answer the all questions at PHD level, and cite and reference according to Harvard referencing system I am in such a dilemma I just never get a paper that is up to standard on first attempt. Please sort out your plagiarism problems my ceiling is 15% through turnitin..

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total: